Apology for a Murderby Lorenzino de Medici
Translated by Andrew Brown
Published by Alma Classics
History, classic, non-fiction
Famed for having killed his cousin Alessandro, the Duke of Florence, in 1537, but also for writing accomplished literary works, including a comedy and several poems, Lorenzino de' Medici remains one of the most enigmatic figures of Italian literature. In his masterpiece, Apology for a Murder, he reveals the inner motives behind his act, portraying himself as a hero to be numbered alongside the great tyrannicides of ancient Rome and Greece.
Lorenzino himself, in 1548, was murdered by two soldiers hired either by the emperor Charles V or by Cosimo, Alessandro's successor as Duke, and this volume includes the dramatic account of his killing by Francesco Bibboni, one of the assassins, as well as a selection of Lorenzino's poems, giving a fully rounded image of the antihero of Alfred de Musset's Lorenzaccio.
Apology for a Murder includes both Lorenzino de Medici's piece where he tries to justify the murder of his cousin Alessandro, the Duke of Florence, and an account of Lorenzino's death written by Captain Francesco Bibboni, a soldier who kills Lorenzino. Both accounts are brilliant in their own way: Lorenzino certainly knows how to write a compelling argument and Bibboni is not ashamed of his actions and gives a rather honest account of a live of Renaissance mercenary.
As Andrew Brown says, Lorenzino was not a popular man. He was called 'nasty Lorenzo' and spend his days with Alessandro. People saw them as close friends and Lorenzino as Alessandro's accomplice. In Apology for a Murder Lorenzino tries his hardest to convince the reader that he was never a friend for Alessandro, who was a tyrant and therefore Lorenzino should be celebrated because he freed the people of Florence from tyrant's grasp. It is uncertain whether Lorenzino lied or not - Alessandro was a tyrant, but there is no prove of Lorenzino's motives either way. Apology for a Murder could be genuine, but it could also be propaganda where Lorenzino tried to clear his name. Either way, it's an interesting historical text and Lorenzino has a way with words.
Bibboni's account, however, was my favourite because it gives a detailed account of the life of assassin/mercenary soldier in Renaissance Europe - and the historian in me loves that kind of rich source, particularly since Bibboni does not apologise for his actions. Rather, he states how things are and the soldiers are only doing what they were hired to do, whether it was moral or not. These kind of texts - both Lorenzino and Bibboni's texts - are why I love studying history so much. It is not so much about the truth, but the perspective and here we have two entirely different perspectives, which gives us plenty to think about.
5 of 5 stars







